‘Distracted boyfriend’ advert ruled sexist

A distracted boyfriend looks at another woman while his girlfriend looks on in disgust 'Distracted boyfriend' advert ruled sexist 'Distracted boyfriend' advert ruled sexist e31d278f1bImage copyrightGetty Images

A Swedish internet company broke gender discrimination rules by using a popular meme in an advertisement, the country’s advertising regulator has ruled.

Bahnhof posted a version of the “distracted boyfriend” meme on Facebook, to advertise job vacancies.

The image, which shows a man looking at a woman in a red dress while his girlfriend looks on in horror, has been widely parodied online.

But the regulator said the image was discriminatory to both men and women.

Bahnhof’s version of the meme shows:

  • “you”, the distracted boyfriend
  • “Bahnhof”, the woman in a red dress
  • “your current employer”, the girlfriend looking on in horror
Skip Facebook post by Bahnhof

På jakt efter ett nytt jobb? Just nu letar vi efter säljare, drifttekniker och en skillad webbdesigner. Kolla in vår sida med lediga tjänster här: https://www.bahnhof.se/om/karriar

Posted by Bahnhof on Wednesday, 4 April 2018

End of Facebook post by Bahnhof

The regulator, Reklamombudsmannen, said the image objectified women by showing the man’s “appreciative reaction”.

It was also “sexually discriminatory” towards men by “imparting a stereotype picture of men looking at women as being interchangeable”.

Image copyrightGetty Images
Image caption The regulator said Bahnhof’s ad was sexist

The regulator told the BBC the ruling was to be taken as advice on good advertising ethics.

Bahnhof will not have to remove the image and will not be fined.

In a statement, Bahnhof said: “Anyone who supports both the internet and meme-culture knows precisely how this meme is used and interpreted.

“We explained both the purpose of the image and meme-culture for the regulator but they have chosen to interpret the post in a different way.”

Skip Twitter post by @AngryExile


— Angry Exile (@AngryExile) September 26, 2018

End of Twitter post by @AngryExile

The ruling was largely ridiculed online by people who suggested the regulator had failed to correctly interpret the image.

Original Source